Abuja may become Gafcon’s headquarters — but it is not the headquarters of the Anglican Communion

Gyronny Herald Comment banner

The Global Anglican Council is entitled to establish its headquarters wherever it chooses. It is not entitled simply to assume the identity of the worldwide Anglican Communion.

The Global Anglican Council has announced that Abuja, Nigeria, is to become the headquarters of what it calls the “Global Anglican Communion”.

The decision was taken at a meeting of the Council in Recife, Brazil, on Saturday 22 August 2026. Announcing the move, Council chairman Archbishop Laurent Mbanda said Abuja had acquired particular importance through the G26 gathering and the resulting Abuja Affirmation.

That Affirmation declared that Gafcon had “reordered the Anglican Communion” as a global Church. The proposed headquarters is intended initially to serve as an administrative centre, with longer-term hopes that it might become a place for gathering, training and equipping Anglican leaders.

The Council says that it will work with the Church of Nigeria as the plans develop.

There is, however, a fundamental problem with the language of the announcement.

National Christian Centre in Abuja, with its detached tower and crosses, beneath the headline “Abuja: A headquarters — but for whom?”
The National Christian Centre in Abuja. The Global Anglican Council plans to establish its headquarters in the Nigerian capital. Photograph: Gafcon; graphic treatment: Gyronny Herald.

A headquarters for Gafcon’s new structure

The Global Anglican Council may establish an office in Abuja. It may develop buildings, employ staff, organise conferences and create structures for those churches and dioceses choosing to participate in its movement.

What it cannot do, simply by declaration, is make Abuja the headquarters of the Anglican Communion.

The Anglican Communion already exists as a worldwide family of autonomous but interdependent churches. Its recognised structures include the Archbishop of Canterbury, the Lambeth Conference, the Primates’ Meeting and the Anglican Consultative Council.

Its official secretariat remains the Anglican Communion Office at St Andrew’s House in London.

Neither a conference statement nor a decision of the Global Anglican Council automatically abolishes those institutions, transfers their authority or removes churches from the existing Communion.

The announcement therefore concerns the headquarters of the ecclesial structure being created by Gafcon and its allies. Describing that structure as the Global Anglican Communion does not establish that it has replaced the Anglican Communion itself.

A name is a claim. It is not proof that the claim has been accepted.

A substantial Anglican movement

None of this is to suggest that Gafcon is insignificant.

It includes or enjoys the support of several large Anglican provinces, particularly in Africa, and speaks for many Anglicans who believe that parts of the existing Communion have departed from historic Christian teaching.

Its criticism of the Communion’s present arrangements is real, organised and influential. The decision to establish a permanent headquarters demonstrates that its leaders are building something intended to endure.

The choice of Abuja is also understandable. The numerical and spiritual centre of worldwide Anglicanism has long been moving away from England and towards Africa and other parts of the Global South. Any account of contemporary Anglican life that treats England as its only meaningful centre would be badly mistaken.

But recognising that shift does not require accepting Gafcon’s assertion that its own organisation has become the Anglican Communion.

Overlapping membership makes the claim more complicated

The position is further complicated because some churches associated with Gafcon have not formally ceased to be member churches of the existing Anglican Communion.

The Church of Nigeria, with which the Council will develop the Abuja headquarters, continues to appear in the Anglican Communion’s directory of member churches. Other Gafcon-aligned provinces retain similar connections.

That produces an unusual situation: leaders may reject the existing Instruments of Communion and declare that a new ordering has replaced them, while the churches they lead have not necessarily completed a formal departure from the Communion whose structures they reject.

Anglican identity has never depended upon a single centralised authority in the manner of some other Christian traditions. Its relationships are ecclesial, historical and constitutional, and the provinces themselves are autonomous. That makes disagreement, impaired communion and realignment possible — but it also means that no one faction can unilaterally redefine the whole family.

A rival communion may be emerging

The most accurate description may be that Gafcon is constructing a new or rival Anglican communion, substantially overlapping with the existing one but governed through different structures and founded upon a more explicitly confessional basis.

Whether that body grows, becomes fully separate or continues in an ambiguous relationship with the existing Communion will depend upon what individual provinces and dioceses actually decide.

Those decisions cannot be made for them by a declaration issued in Abuja or Recife.

The distinction matters. Reporting the Global Anglican Council’s terminology without qualification risks presenting a disputed ecclesiastical claim as an established fact.

Abuja is to become the headquarters of the organisation led by the Global Anglican Council. It may become an important centre for a large and influential part of global Anglicanism.

It has not, through the Council’s announcement, become the headquarters of the Anglican Communion.

Sources

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.